Available:*
Format | Library | Call Number | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Book | Searching... South Regional Library | 362.1 Gor | Searching... Unknown |
Bound With These Titles
On Order
Summary
Summary
Why do some parents refuse to vaccinate their children? Why do some keep guns at home, despite scientific evidence of risk to their family members? And why do people use antibiotics for illnesses they can't possibly alleviate? When it comes to health, many people insist that science is wrong, that the evidence is incomplete or inconclusive, and that unidentified hazards lurk everywhere to harm us.In Denying to the Grave, authors Sara and Jack Gorman explore the psychology of health science denial. Using several examples of such denial as test cases, they propose six key principles that may lead individuals to reject "accepted" health-related wisdom: the charismatic leader; fear of complexity; confirmation bias and the internet; fear of corporate and government conspiracies; filling the ignorance gap; and the nature of risk prediction. The authors argue that the health sciences are especially vulnerable to our innate resistance to integrate new concepts with pre-existing beliefs. This psychological difficulty of incorporating new information is on the cutting edge of neuroscience research; scientists have identified brain responses to new information.Denying to the Grave explores risk theory and how people make decisions about what is best for them and their loved ones, in an effort to better understand how people think when faced with significant health decisions. This book points the way to a new and important understanding of how science should be conveyed to the public in order to save lives with existing knowledge and technology.
Author Notes
Sara Gorman, PhD, MPH, is a public health specialist at a large multinational healthcare company, where she works on global mental health, increasing the quality of evidence in the global health field, and alternative funding models for global health. She has written extensively about global health, HIV/AIDS policy, and women's health, among other topics, for a variety of health and medical journals, including PLoS Medicine, the International Journal of Women's Health, and AIDS Care. She has worked in the policy division at the HIV Law Project and as a researcher at the Epidemiology Department at Harvard School of Public Health. She has also analyzed mental health policy under the ACA for the Vera Institute of Justice and researched the effectiveness of semi-mobile HIV clinics in rural Kenya for HealthRight International.Jack M. Gorman, MD, is CEO and Chief Scientific Officer of Franklin Behavioral Health Consultants. Dr. Gorman was on the faculty of Columbia University's Department of Psychiatry for 25 years, eventually serving as Lieber Professor of Psychiatry. He then became the Esther and Joseph Klingenstein Professor and Chair of Psychiatry and Professor of Neuroscience at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
Reviews (1)
Library Journal Review
In this superb book, Sara E. Gorman (project manager, Johnson & Johnson Global Public Health) and psychiatrist Jack M. Gorman (CEO & chief scientific officer, (Franklin Behavioral Health; The Essential Guide to Psychiatric Drugs) collaborate to explain why many people deny scientifically established facts, even in the face of compelling evidence. In addition, they provide "guiding principles" designed to address the problem. To illustrate their point, the authors focus on the example of parents who believe that childhood vaccines cause autism. While research studies confirm that there is no causal connection and also discredit rogue articles maintaining a link, medical professionals must still defend the efficacy of, and necessity for, vaccinations. Why? Using tenets from social psychology and behavioral economics, the authors elucidate ways in which conspiracy theories, charismatic leaders, confirmation bias, causality and filling the ignorance gap, avoidance of complexity, and risk perception and probability factor into denialism. Ultimately, they propose early and enhanced education in the scientific method to cultivate necessary critical thinking. VERDICT Perfect for fans of the subject and Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow.-Lynne Maxwell, West Virginia Univ. Coll. of Law Lib., Morgantown © Copyright 2016. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Table of Contents
| Acknowledgments | p. ix |
| Introduction | p. 1 |
| 1 Conspiracy Theories | p. 35 |
| 2 Charismatic Leaders | p. 65 |
| 3 Confirmation Bias | p. 107 |
| 4 Causality and Filling the Ignorance Gap | p. 143 |
| 5 Avoidance of Complexity | p. 173 |
| 6 Risk Perception and Probability | p. 209 |
| Conclusion | p. 243 |
| Notes | p. 267 |
| About the Authors | p. 301 |
| Index | p. 303 |